
Global Events
Welcome to the Institute for the Study of States of Exception Global Events page, featuring global events that shed light on the misuse of emergency powers and the erosion of democratic norms. Through curated updates and analysis, we connect the headlines to the deeper patterns of authoritarianism, resistance, and rule of law.
“Emergency powers are, at one and the same time, necessary for preserving the life of the nation and dangerous to that life.”
— Oren Gross and Fionnuala Ní Aoláin (Law in Times of Crisis, 2006)
On August 29, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a May 2025 decision by the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) in V.O.S. Selections, Inc. v. United States, which had held in favor of the plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgement, and determining that U.S. President Donald Trump’s use of emergency powers under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose sweeping tariffs was unlawful. While affirming the CIT’s decision, the Federal Circuit did however pause its ruling from taking effect until October 14, 2025, allowing tariffs to remain in place while the Trump administration seeks relief from the U.S. Supreme Court to reverse the decision. Indeed on September 02, 2025, President Trump told reporters at the White House that he would seek an “expedited ruling” from the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn this decision. Given the doctrinal importance of the case, especially its implications for emergency powers, non-delegation, and the Major Questions Doctrine, it is likely that the Court would grant certiorari…
On 11 August 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump declared a crime emergency in the District of Columbia, placing the D.C. police department under federal control, and deploying the District of Columbia National Guard within the city. The White House also concurrently directed Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth to coordinate with State Governors to authorize the orders of any additional members of other states’ National Guards to active service, as deemed necessary and appropriate to augment the President’s intent…
A week ago, President Donald Trump and members of his cabinet announced a takeover of law enforcement functions in Washington, D.C. using three tools: deployment of elements of the D.C. National Guard (and National Guard troops from several cooperating states as well), invocation of a statutory emergency power to requisition the services of the city’s Metropolitan Police Department, and a surge of federal law enforcement to the city’s streets, including Department of Homeland Security, Federal Bureau of Investigation, and other federal agents. Over the past week, 800 D.C. National Guardsmen have been mobilized for operations in the city, with hundreds more state National Guardsmen on their way, and 500 newly deployed immigration and other federal agents are patrolling the streets or have set up checkpoints. At the same time, the district and the White House have engaged in a power struggle over control of the city’s police department…
Not even a year into his second term, President Trump has (as of 11 August 2025) declared 11 national emergencies, exceeding every president’s single-term total except for his own previous record of 13 national emergency declarations.
An embedded chart in this report depicts National emergencies declared annually by U.S. Presidents, from 1979 to 2025 (as of 11 August 2025)…
Per reporting from the Associated Press, on 31 July 2025, El Salvador's Legislative Assembly pushed through a constitutional reform overnight eliminating presidential term limits, fueling concerns that it paves the way for President Nayib Bukele to indefinitely stay in power…
The Vox article, “Donald Trump keeps declaring national emergencies. Why?” published on May 18, 2025, examines President Trump’s unprecedented use of national emergency declarations during the first 100 days of his second term. As of this writing, he has declared eight national emergencies across various domains, including the southern border, energy, trade, drug trafficking, and the International Criminal Court. These declarations grant him access to special powers outlined in over 150 legal provisions, enabling actions beyond or against congressional authorization. The article features insights from Elizabeth Goitein of the Brennan Center for Justice, who discusses the history and potential for misuse of these powers, especially given the limited checks on presidential authority following a 1983 Supreme Court ruling that removed Congress’s ability to veto emergency declarations…
According to a 2024 academic analysis published by the Columbia Undergraduate Law Review, El Salvador has continuously extended its state of emergency since March 27, 2022. , using vague constitutional language that allows indefinite suspension of civil liberties. The Salvadoran constitution permits 30-day emergency declarations but includes a loophole allowing renewal if “circumstances continue.” Despite a reported 70% drop in homicides by 2023, the emergency remains in place, now reauthorized more than two dozen times. Under this regime, over two percent of the adult population has been incarcerated, with numerous reports of arbitrary detention, denial of due process, and alleged torture in state custody. The article contrasts El Salvador’s system with South Africa’s constitutional framework, offering it as one model for more accountable governance that integrates checks on emergency power…
According to The Guardian, on April 4, 2025, South Korea’s President Yoon Suk Yeol was removed from office following a unanimous Constitutional Court decision. The court ruled that Yoon’s December martial law order constituted a “grave betrayal of the trust of the people” and violated the proper exercise of emergency powers. As a result, interim leader Han Duck-soo has been appointed to govern until a new president is elected within 60 days. In a brief statement, President Yoon apologized and acknowledged the court’s decision. The 111-day impeachment process, set against rising concerns for the country’s democratic future, culminated in this decisive action. Additionally, the report notes that Yoon may face a separate criminal trial related to charges of insurrection. South Korea’s conservative party stated that it “solemnly accepts” the outcome, while opposition leaders hailed the ruling as a victory for democracy…