From Constitutional Risk Management to Constitutional Risk Management (Emergency Law Misuse) in Hungary

Journal Article: From Constitutional Risk Management to Constitutional Risk Management (Emergency Law Misuse) in Hungary

Journal: European Journal of Risk Regulation - Special Issue on Constitutional Risk Management in the V4 Countries, Edited by Zoltán Szente & Fruzsina Gárdos-Orosz

Date of Publication: February 3, 2025

Author: Fruzsina Gárdos-Orosz, HUN-REN CSS Institute for Legal Studies, Budapest, Hungary; and Evelin Burján, Eötvös Loránd University Faculty of Law, Budapest, Hungary

How to Cite:  Gárdos-Orosz, F; Burján, E. From Constitutional Risk Management to Constitutional Risk Management (Emergency Law Misuse) in Hungary. European Journal of Risk Regulation. 2025;16(2): 421-432. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2024.102

Abstract: The paper offers a comprehensive overview of Hungary’s emergency law and its misuse over the four years since its introduction in March 2020. Hungary serves as a clear example of how a “state of danger” – initially intended as an exceptional legal measure – can become normalised through repeated declarations. The populist government’s continuous use of emergency powers has led to unchecked lawmaking and the manipulation of legal frameworks to advance populist agendas. The article argues that while Hungary’s detailed emergency provisions in the Fundamental Law were intended to serve as a form of constitutional risk management, after four years of living in a permanent “state of danger”, the scholarly debate has shifted to whether this very risk management has itself become the risk. According to emergency law theory, managing constitutional risks is equally vital in the emergency legal order. Yet in Hungary, both the black letter of the law and the constitutional practices observed during and after the COVID-19 pandemic – along with the Ninth Amendment to the Fundamental Law, which introduced a new emergency regime in 2021 – reveal that constitutional risk management has ultimately failed. This is manifest in the erosion of the separation of powers, the weakening of judicial review, and the shrinking of human rights protections. The article substantiates its argument by examining the related constitutional framework and constitutional practice in Hungary between 2020 and 2024.

The article can be found here, and in PDF form here.

Photo by Gabriel Miklós on Unsplash.

Previous
Previous

Emergencies Under Czech Law

Next
Next

Constitutional Challenges in Emergency Governance: An Analysis of Poland’s Reluctance and Regulatory Ambiguities in States of Emergency